The inverse of split is the join function
No, it's not. If that would be true, I could use join to create the same string I split with split. But this is obviously not always possible. Think splitting on a regex that matches more than one string (for instance /\s+/), or the throwing away of trailing empty fields.
I missed the explaination of the meaning of a negative third argument.
Abigail
In reply to Re: Tutorial suggestion: split and join
by Abigail-II
in thread Tutorial suggestion: split and join
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |