Yes, that looks is a lot easier to read than the separate option declarations. Actually, I thought I reformatted that before I posted it here... Go figure :) I also like the idea of declaring the option init values in a hash, since it would make the code more legible (not to mention namespace economy). I'll definitely make both of those changes.
--
Allolex
In reply to Re: Re: Constructive criticism of a dictionary / text comparison script
by allolex
in thread Constructive criticism of a dictionary / text comparison script
by allolex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |