I really like your idea and it would work very well if I were dealing with texts languages that all had a stemming module. I am seriously considering writing one for French. Currently, I am working with Italian, which does have Lingua::Stem::It, but my dictionary has word forms as well. The huge advantage of working with a stemmer is that it is also capable of stemming novel constructions (like stemage), which the dictionary does not account for. It would be a very interesting modification to create a dictionary of stem forms, but it would also be a lot more work checking its accuracy.
What would really be cool is a stemming module that defined all affixes via a hash of some kind, so that tense, mode/mood, plural, person, etc. could be looked up like
my %hash_of_verb_suffixes = ( future => qw([ei]rò [ei]rai [ei]rà [ei]remo [ei]rete [ei]ranno), conditional => qw([ei]rei [ei]resti [ei]rebbe [ei]remmo [ei]reste [ +ei]rebbero) )
and so on.
Oh, wait. That's a POS tagger;)
In any case, I can see we think along similar lines. Thanks!
--
Allolex
In reply to Re: Re: Constructive criticism of a dictionary / text comparison script
by allolex
in thread Constructive criticism of a dictionary / text comparison script
by allolex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |