No, not really, not in a reliable fashion, since exports and references and anonymous subroutines can all get in the way. I suspect there's an easier way to accomplish what you really need, though. What is the problem you're trying to solve?
In reply to Re: Getting the name of the subroutine called. There is a way for a clone references?!
by chromatic
in thread Getting the name of the subroutine called. There is a way for a clone references?!
by gmpassos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |