I've seen something like this done before, a long time ago, but I guess I just accepted it as 'magic'. I was reminded on CB that a FP number wouldn't make any sense as a subscript and so the DWIMish gnomes happily fixed the value. But sometimes I get this panicky feeling that if the magic isn't documented, it'll run away when I'm not looking.
In reply to Re: Re: converting hash to shuffled array
by shenme
in thread converting hash to shuffled array
by sulfericacid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |