Actually I guessed the first two, and the third makes sense. I was equally impressed by the :: sub name.
When I was developing the thing, I had a loop that for testing purposes called all of the closures, and so !\n was printed after each.
Heh.. well, to de-obfuscate the thing, I put in some Data::Dumper statements. It made the output interesting! :lol:
In reply to Re: Re: Slashdot lamejoke generator
by Notromda
in thread Slashdot lamejoke generator
by jonadab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |