Overall I liked the article and wasn't put off by the slightly confrontational style, but this comment threw me a bit:
You probably think I'm going to talk about very old character sets like EBCDIC here. Well, I won't. EBCDIC is not relevant to your life. We don't have to go that far back in time.
I was once chatting with an IBM pre-sales consultant who gave me the fact-oid that something like 80% of the data in the world live on mainframes in EBCDIC (VSAM?) files i.e. the vast majority of data is not in relational databases.
I must say that I am still suprised by this and not sure I believe it but the assertion that EBCDIC is dead and of no importance is, I think, flawed.
Regards,
Dom.
In reply to Re: Programmers, script languages, and Unicode
by dbush
in thread Programmers, script languages, and Unicode
by dbwiz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |