Er, no. Whatever reason I had in not doing an unconditional require() has entirely evaporated.
In reply to Re: Re: LWP::Simple::Cookies - adds cookie support to LWP::Simple (just require)
by diotalevi
in thread LWP::Simple::Cookies - adds cookie support to LWP::Simple
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |