Er, no. Whatever reason I had in not doing an unconditional require() has entirely evaporated.
In reply to Re: Re: LWP::Simple::Cookies - adds cookie support to LWP::Simple (just require)
by diotalevi
in thread LWP::Simple::Cookies - adds cookie support to LWP::Simple
by diotalevi
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |