Unfortunately getting the extra 20% is an exercise in diminishing returns.
This is a very complex problem and you'll need to decide how much time (and/or money) you're prepared to spend getting as close to a complete solution as you deem necessary.
There are some pretty impressive (and very expensive) commercial solutions dedicated to this problem.
However you approach it, a machine will never get to 100% accuracy (at least not at this point).
If the information in this post is inaccurate, or just plain wrong, don't just downvote - please post explaining what's wrong.
That way everyone learns.
In reply to Re: Re: Some kind of fuzzy logic.
by BazB
in thread Some kind of fuzzy logic.
by the_0ne
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |