The question was more a case of, "I wonder why strict doesn't propogate to regex code blocks?", rather than "Why woudln't 'they' let it propogate?"... but your point is taken. It will be nice to see the extended features legitimised, whatever final form they take.
I wonder what chance there is of getting a "capture to named vars" contruct added?
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: my versus our in nested regex
by BrowserUk
in thread my versus our in nested regex
by Len
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |