If it's called as an object method, you should probably be handling everything internally as an object, not a class.This is a tried-and-true stmt which ha nothing to do with the topic at hand :)
The idea is to get at the __DATA__ of the invocant even in the subroutine resolves to a parent as I discussed in the earlier node.
Polymorphism supports subroutines but not __DATA__ sections
Carter's compass: I know I'm on the right track when by deleting something, I'm adding functionality.
In reply to Re: Re: Working around non-polymorphic __DATA__ sections
by princepawn
in thread Working around non-polymorphic __DATA__ sections
by princepawn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |