Now you know why Perl doesn't have a switch statement . . .
It should still get one, since the advantage of C switches it that they have O(1) efficency, whereas most of the equivilent idioms in Perl have O(n) worst-case time. <UPDATE>Actually, the one posted above always runs in O(n) time.</UPDATE> <UPDATE2>Oops, that update wasn't quite true. Thanks demerphq.</UPDATE2> You can get O(1) time using a hash table that stores subroutine refs, but then you make implementing fall-through a lot harder.
Fortunatly, we're getting a real switch in Perl6.
----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer
:(){ :|:&};:
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
In reply to Re: Perl Idioms Explained: && and || "Short Circuit" operators
by hardburn
in thread Perl Idioms Explained - && and || "Short Circuit" operators
by davido
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |