Right, but why on earth would you assume a pointer to an object in this case? The original bit wasn't talking about a reference to a perl object, so I assumed it was a typo. Just because the syntax passes the compiler doesn't mean it is what he meant. :)
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't use printf enough
by jryan
in thread I don't use printf enough
by dreadpiratepeter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |