I'm amazed.
I've long seen @{[stuff]} used for interpolation, but that saves only one character over interpolation (5 vs 6 chars), is unclear, and puts stuff into the wrong context.
By contrast what you've pointed out takes 4 characters, is unclear, but puts things in the right context. However it is a bit fragile.
I wonder why I haven't seen this pointed out before?
I'll definitely be remembering this, if for no reason than golf. But while I prefer it to the @{[...]} interpolation method, I still prefer concatenation over both.
UPDATE: Reminder to self, always test assumptions...
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.