That said, noting that I can do it directly with atan2 won't convince me not to reach for 4*atan2(1,1) for several reasons:
In reply to Re: •Re: Re: Deriving pi and e
by tilly
in thread Deriving pi and e
by fredopalus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |