If I interpret this correctly [...] the theorum provides a way of calculating a set of bounds within which the next prime will be located which reduces the search area considerably
Your conclusion is dead wrong but I don't think it is due to a problem of interpretation. (:
You could use the theorem to restrict the search area for the next prime but it would be much more useful to use other techniques to restrict the search area:
That is, if you used the theorem to find the lower bound of where to search, it would return a value quite a bit below P so using the (obvious) lower limit of P will be a much better choice. And finding an upper bound of where to search is of no use since it will be too high to make sense to start looking there and starting on the low end means we know we will find a prime (the one we are looking for) before we get to the upper bound (or else we'd have proved the theorem incorrect).
In reply to Re^2: Finding the next larger prime. (conclusions)
by tye
in thread Finding the next larger prime.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |