However, forcing everybody to add declarations for any runtime-generated subroutines strikes me as both un-perlish and extremely unlikely to happen.
There's no reason it couldn't be a pragma. Why stop with use strict; use warnings; use diagnostics; use Taint; when you can add use predeclaredsubs; use predefinedsubs; and maybe no earlyreturns; no typeglobs; and possibly use bondage; use discipline; use pain; use Inline::Pascal;
$;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}} split//,".rekcah lreP rehtona tsuJ";$\=$ ;->();print$/
In reply to Re: When -w and use strict aren't enough...
by jonadab
in thread When -w and use strict aren't enough...
by RMGir
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |