Dunno, in my benchmark (performed after I wrote the node, of course), they seem to come out pretty even, so I'd be likely to go with the 'optimized regex' answer given by the AM. Did you have different results? Maybe my benchmark wasn't very good...
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Genesis of a sort routine
by edan
in thread Genesis of a sort routine
by greenFox
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |