It may not be as accurate as what [jargon://] may give you, but it is definitely more up to date and definitely more fun.
Liz
Update:
After doing some testing on Googlism, I'd have to agree with sauoq and tye. At one point in the past, I was sure it was doing different things for different type of queries. It doesn't seem to do that anymore. So I guess a [googlism://] without type parameter would be best. If anyone would take the trouble of implementing this, of course ;-)
Update:
Actually, I like Aristotle's suggestion for [ism://] even better.
In reply to Who What Where When! by liz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |