The only problem i have with JS validation is that it is
going to produce redundant code. You see that JS validation
is no substitute for server-side validation, as tools such
as
LWP and crew make it very easy to bypass your
front-end "security". As long as you don't mind maintaining
both the JS and server validation, then god-speed to you,
but i still think that JS validation is waste of my time and
my client's money. ;)
UPDATE:
I can admit that what sauoq says is good -
if you do have some expensive submission that will benefit
from being validated on the client side first, well ...
go for it. Some redundancy isn't so bad, especially when
you compare the chore of keeping it consistant to ...
washing dishes. :D It just ain't so bad after all. ;)
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.