I also downvoted your node I am replying to for being this presumptuous.
would it be less presumptious to say 'the 5 monks who want nothing ever to change, the 10 monks who don't want to implement the change, the 15 monks who are ideologicaly opposed to the change and the 6 monks who habit Anonymous'?
is it any less presumptious to say that all 36 were from monks voting their conscious?
but i do applaud you for your plans not to use Anonymous. and i have no plans to use Anonymous either. now we know two people (three plus Abigail-II) that won't be the Anonymous. many many more to go.
In reply to Re: Re^x: No Anonymous Reply Option
by zengargoyle
in thread No Anonymous Reply Option
by artist
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |