Paraphrased (in good fun):
I know that there are already a lot of nodes about this but I couldn't be bothered to look for any of them but that one recent one even though it contained a link to another which itself contained links to several more...
;) Including Re: Automatic Re-ing with numbers (searching). But seriously...
I mentioned this same idea in (tye)Re: Dingbats in node titles: What's your opinion. I particularly like unique titles but, having seen "Re^15:..." just today, I'm not sure even I support the idea.
Though I would like to support "Re^15: ..." as the new default if all the details can be worked out (so I wouldn't suggest one holds one's breath unless one is actually writing code to accomplish it -- for which you can find some of my initial stabs at it via a few choice clicks).
Perhaps "Re^$depth.$sequence: $title"...
In reply to Re^1: Re: (revisited)...(again) (research)
by tye
in thread Re: (revisited)...(again)
by Paulster2
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |