1) I know. It's code that's been simplified to show the problem.
2) That's what I thought. I know that /x is not relevant in the first case, but I was trying to show two very consistent cases, one of which works and one doesn't when I think they both should.
3) But the regex is applied with the x modifier at the expression level. Doesn't that mean that the comment should be treated as a comment?
In reply to RE: (Ovid) Re: codem/(?:-x pattern) #comment /x bug?/code
by dcorbin
in thread codem/(?:-x pattern) #comment /x bug?/code
by dcorbin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |