Thanks tachyon, that's great.
I did compile the original C code as a C program and use it for comparisons with the perl version when I was working on this, though that was some time ago. The C was obviously much faster.
Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, I still live in the "nothing I must compile myself" perl world.
I do have a version of 5.8.1 that I compiled with Borland that works, but every time I've tried to use modules that require compilation in conjunction with that build, I spend hours or days trying to hack the build into working. I'm ashamed to say that I gave up and went back to being a AS dependant.
Thanks to the number of kind folks around that make binary versions of those modules that AS haven't gotten around to yet, I rarely encounter a module that I cannot install and use in short order, given the appropriate googling.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Fast string hash in portable perl?
by BrowserUk
in thread Fast string hash in portable perl?
by jhanna
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |