The only "1:N" relationship I see is the "one page has many columns" and that you need to normalize, which you did by making the original "table column". In that table there is no "1:N" relationship left to further normalize.
CountZero
"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law
In reply to Re: Class::DBI has_many
by CountZero
in thread Class::DBI has_many
by arc_of_descent
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |