This note might confuse newbies, so I thought just add a comment.
"That should have been =~!"
What merly said is that, that was a typo, and not what he wanted. (As you can see, he is the owner of that web page.)
But as a Perl statement, it is absolutely valid, and jweed has already given a full explanation.
In reply to Re: •Re: = rather than =~ ?
by pg
in thread = rather than =~ ?
by bcrowell2
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |