I don't think that we are going to come to agreement on whether closures are objects.
No, probably not.
I don't think I really made this point very well above (which is my fault), but it's not that I put an absolute stamp on closures as objects. Rather, I think they can be used as a limited form of object, but they're not limited to OO, either.
----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer
: () { :|:& };:
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
In reply to Re^5: The world is not object oriented
by hardburn
in thread The world is not object oriented
by tilly
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |