You are right. I just benchmarked it. The overhead of
the maps far outweighs the cost of the sort. In fact it
is so slow I will have to ask p5p about it. Here is my
test:
use strict;
use Benchmark;
use vars qw(%hash %test);
for (1..1000) {
$hash{"key$_"}{this} = "num$_";
}
%test = (
schwartz => sub {
my @sorted = map $_->[0],
sort {$a->[1] cmp $b->[1]}
map [$_, $hash{$_}{this}], keys %hash;
},
straight => sub {
my @sorted = sort
{ $hash{$a}{this} <=> $hash{$b}{this} }
keys %hash;
},
stupid => sub {
my @sorted = sort
{
my $foo = [$a, $hash{$a}{this}];
$hash{$a}{this} <=> $hash{$b}{this}
} keys %hash;
},
);
timethese (-1, \%test);
Believe it or not, stupid is several times faster for me
than schwartz. IMO there is simply no possible good reason
for that!
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.