I know this was just meant as a quick example for demonstration purposes, but you'd think you would want a return value from the subs, rather than a printed value. This allows a greater functionality of that method, such as placing the value in a scalar rather than printing it to the screen immediately. Meaning:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; my @objects = ( { name => 'sheep', speak => sub { "baaah" } }, { name => 'dog', speak => sub { "woof" } }, { name => 'mouse', speak => sub { "squeak (almost silently)" } }, { name => 'fish', speak => sub { ".oO()" } } ); printf "a %s goes %s.\n", $_->{name}, $_->{speak}->() for @objects; __END__ a sheep goes baaah. a dog goes woof. a mouse goes squeak (almost silently). a fish goes .oO().
(This is not even nitpicking or saying you did it a dumb way. I was just proud of my own observation on how to improve such a thing for wider use :P)
In reply to Re^2: Object Terminology
by Coruscate
in thread Object Terminology
by stvn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |