Please don't take any of this as negative criticism.Not at all. Your comments are exactly what i am looking for!
I can see now that comments like "greatly misunderstood" are really too much my opinion, and probably need to either edited out or explained better. I was initially not going to provide any links, since i felt it might muddy up the simplicity, but you make a good point, so maybe I will provide a "further reading" type section.
Anybody got any good OO links they want to suggest, I am all ears. (I've got my own, but I dont know them all)Your specific comments in particular are right on. I will take them all under advisement as i do the first re-write.
Thanks again, excellent comments.
-stvnIn reply to Re: Re: Object Terminology
by stvn
in thread Object Terminology
by stvn
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |