I'm running only one concurrent session in the benchmark, because of course if I do more they compete with each other and run up the numbers. The system has 512MB of memory and is lightly loaded; no swapping was going on as the benchmark ran. I believe I ran 50 retrievals; enough to avoid the warning about the sample being too small to be meaningful from ab, anyway.
I was about to go optimize a section of my code that turns out to have almost zero contribution to the total; another example of why one really does need to profile first!
In reply to Re: Re: Startup cost, CGI performance
by dd-b
in thread Startup cost, CGI performance
by dd-b
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |