I don't buy it - Instead of allowing the use of descriptive formatting delimiters such as =head and =item, you replace them with shorthand symbols. The use of shorthand cryptic symbols does nothing to make POD more usable to non-programmers - If anything, this makes it less accessible to non-programmers as there needs to be an association made, which may not always be obvious, between the symbol and it's context and meaning.
If you really wanted to create a tool for non-programmers to create POD, why not create a word processor which allows for a WYSIWYG interface whilst outputting validate POD. Instead, all that you have done is create a cryptic shorthand to replace formatting directives which are already self-explanatory and straightforward.
A better name for this module might be POD::Shorthand or POD::Cryptic, but certainly not anything which suggests that this format is "easy" compared to POD.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: ePod - write easy and simple in easy-POD, convert to POD, and from there you know the way.
by Anonymous Monk
in thread ePod - write easy and simple in easy-POD, convert to POD, and from there you know the way.
by gmpassos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |