I'm not the world's best lexer, but I cannot imagine a situation where // could be misinterpreted. Your example, if I remember right, implies that I could write $_ =~ +;. =~ is the operator that requires a term on the RHS.
Unless, as is often the case, I'm missing something ...
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.
In reply to Re: FMTYEWTK about split //
by dragonchild
in thread FMTYEWTK about split //
by ysth
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |