As for suggestions, I see that it has dependant parameters but not mutually-exclusive parameters.
I wanted to get some replies before I put any effort into re-inventing anything, but my musings indicate that some possible features can be order-dependant, which is a problem with the use of a hash for a prototype. I'm also worried about slowing it down if it's too fancy!
—John
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Passing by Named Parameter
by John M. Dlugosz
in thread Passing by Named Parameter
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |