I wonder who has THE solution which combines shortness and elegance in a tremendous way
You do realise that it is not always possible to reconcile these two aims?
A single "one size fits all" test will not give you the chance of reporting why the password is no good. If this is not a problem, then my best shot looks like:
#! /usr/local/bin/perl -w use strict; while( <DATA> ) { chomp; my $ok = ( length $_ >= 5 and length $_ <=8 and /\d/ and /[A-Z]/ and /[a-z]/ ); print sprintf('%-12s', $_), ($ok ? 'valid' : 'invalid '), "\n"; }
I would probably break it up into separate test as shown elsewhere in this thread. You might also want to avoid reinventing the wheel and look at Data::Password::BasicCheck. Also, given that most people never bother to change the password they are given, you should also investigate Crypt::GeneratePassword.
In reply to Re: regex elegance contest - validate a pw
by grinder
in thread regex elegance contest - validate a pw
by tos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |