Replacing the node 'as typed' in the DB with some cleaned up version would be a mistake in my book. It is very intollerant of coding mistakes or even allowing improvements, and it often isn't nice to the author.
Caching a cleaned copy in addition to the original is fine (but we don't do it and I doubt it'd be a big win just yet) -- and this is possible with the scheme I proposed.
- tye
In reply to Re^6: Site HTML filtering, Phase II (stow cleaned)
by tye
in thread Site HTML filtering, Phase II
by tye
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |