Hey Jaap,
I'm not trying to prove anything. I just wanted to see what the results would be, and since I figured other people might want to also, I posted the results.
Thanks for the optimization... makes a lot of sense. :)
In reply to Re: Re: Lots of rand()s
by David Caughell
in thread Lots of rand()s
by David Caughell
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |