We're using XML::Twig to parse large XML files received from another source. The files are well-formed and valid, but the files lack a DOCTYPE line. We have the correct DTD in another file.

We'd like the benefits of validation. Do I need to insert the DOCTYPE in the XML files to get this? Or is there a way to tell Twig "here's a file, it has no DOCTYPE, but please validate it using the DTD in this file over there"?

The alternative is rewrite each file with the one extra line tucked in at the top, but the files are big, and we'd prefer not to rewrite and shuffle files.

Thanks for any suggestions.

water

In reply to XML::Twig -- validating files lacking DOCTYPE by water

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.