Have you actually done any work with XSLT?
Nope, but see this Kuro5hin.org article on XSLT, which is the reason I don't bother at all.
Have you actually written dynamic webpages in PHP . . .
Yes, I keep knocking my head against it's limitations.
. . . or written OO code in Python or Ruby?
Yes. They're both cleaner than Perl OO.
How much text processing have you done with awk/sed/etc?
Hardly bother to use them, since Perl does what I want.
Note that I was very careful with the wording of each of those statements. PHP is simpler than Perl. Python/Ruby OO is cleaner. Sed/awk/grep/etc. are more specific to text processing. And XSLT is arguably superior (though I wouldn't make that argument myself, clearly somebody thinks it's better (even if they're PHBs) or it wouldn't exist). These are very specific statements of overall "goodness".
What I didn't say was that they were all absolutely superior. Particularly in PHP's case. It is simplier, and that's preciely why I don't like it.
Update: Speeling mistake. Thanks tilly.
----
: () { :|:& };:
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
In reply to Re: Re^2: perl's forte
by hardburn
in thread perl's forte
by kiat
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |