... i think that using SOAP for this is overkill.

For this specific example, I'd agree, but in terms of knowing what you *could* do with it in future if needed, I think it's worth learning. I first looked at SOAP 18 months ago, and decided it was overkill for the project in hand. But I now wish I'd persevered with it. Now I understand it a bit more, it's changing my paradigm on how I view applications that need to run over a network.

It may be a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but one day you might need to smash some concrete with it (how bad can my allegories get :) and I think it's definitely a tool worth understanding - even if you reject it in this instance.

.02

cLive ;-)

In reply to Re: Re: POE vs. SOAP by cLive ;-)
in thread POE vs. SOAP by braswell

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.