Omitting the field names might perhaps be a little faster as your database-engine does not have to map the values to the field names and can just sequentially fill all the fields. (I didn't benchmark it, I'm just guessing).
CountZero
"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law
In reply to Re: Re: Need an array as a function parameter
by CountZero
in thread Need an array as a function parameter
by stonecolddevin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |