Since I do not know what the code is for, I have to ask if 'vanilla' DBI wouldn't be an easier route for a "non-database brain."
If nothing else, you don't need the absolute class names. A newbie posted some basic DBI functionality at 180939 a couple years ago. If you have already used DBI, I won't mention the poster's name so I don't incriminate myself.
Good luck!
In reply to Re: Making a Class::DBI object reference
by bilfurd
in thread Making a Class::DBI object reference
by gryphon
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |