Oops, nice catch, though I would expdect you to spot such an error :). I can only say that mine does work, though with a rather less competitive performance. It's just like me to take something as dandy as the Schwartzian Transform and use it wrongly. Thanks for the correction, it will never happen again, I promise. ++ for the removal of chomp and the additional of the extra pair of capturing parentheses. Why didn't I think of that?
In reply to Re^3: complicated sorting issue
by Anonymous Monk
in thread complicated sorting issue
by geektron
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |