I just grepped my source repository to see where I'd written that and I couldn't find it. The general case I'd thought of where it was annoying or inconvenient to the narrative to give the topicalized variable a name. I can't find an example (though I did just find a code-typo in Switch.pm where ~= was said instead of =~).
for ( ... ) { $foo = /.../; }
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
by diotalevi
in thread Why do we say the =~ operator "binds"?
by Cody Pendant
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |