Sorry , I meant each of them was quite competent in each langauge/domain. And whilst finding developers good in multiple languages is hard, my position stands that that these developers will be be better at development (as opposed to using neat features of one language) than a developer who knows one language.Oh, sure, and if you get Linus Torvalds or Damian Conway as programmers, they are likely to be better at developming programs than Joe R. Programmer. Still, even if you have the four best programmers in the world, it isn't at all clear that it isn't better if they used one language between them instead of four.
but they support that argument with the justification that Java can do anything Perl can - my position is that that is not a sufficient reason in itself to drop PerlIt wasn't presented as a sufficient reason to drop Perl. It was one of the arguments of not keeping Perl. It basically nullifies a possible counter argument, that you can do things with Perl that you can't do with Java.
Abigail
In reply to Re: Is Java really better than Perl???
by Abigail-II
in thread Is Java really better than Perl???
by Roger
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |