is this (ab)use of -p blessed by p5p and/or Larry?I can't speak for them of course, but I would venture that it's allowed with the understanding that the -p "template" could change in the future in subtle ways that would break this type of "use".
On the other hand, given the use of source filters such as Perligata and Lingua::tlhInganHol::yIghun (Klingon) (which unfortunately I can't find the actual module for), it seems that the Perl community would have an interest in making the language stable under these uses. [I'm sure I've made some gross error concerning source filters, but I'll just encourage the community to correct it here, and enlighten the rest of us.]
Considering the simplicity and elegance of the template approach for -p and the like, I feel comfortable that that abuse is stable as well.
-QM
--
Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of
In reply to Re: Re^3: Using -i in oneliner with postprocessing
by QM
in thread Using -i in oneliner with postprocessing
by Anomynous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |