I was under the impression that a more common notation was '
U,D,F,B,L,R for 90° clockwise turns, '
U²,D²,F²,B²,L²,R²' for 90° turns, and either '
U',D',F',B',L',R'' ('prime') or '
U-1,D-1,F-1,B-1,L-1,R-1' for 90° anti-clockwise.
The obvious advantage of this system is that
U' or
U-1 imply the inverse of
U.
I would be inclined to agree with you to the security of the cryptosystem. Istr that a 2x2 cube has only ~10
7 permutations, which strikes me as a rather small number compared to those people throw around when talking about PGP (but then, i am not a cryptologist). The number of permutations increases exponentially with cube size, so if you a use a bigger one, this may cease to be a problem.
It
would be really cool if you could use the resulting cryptosystem using nothing but a Rubik's cube, some paper, and a lot of free time (à la '<cite>Pontifex</cite>'), but maybe that's a little optimistic.....
Some interesting cube-related links from my bookmarks: