You're right, I would have expected that too. Looking more closely, it turns out that it doesn't get constant-folded at all - I guess the repeat operator isn't included for that optimisation.
(I checked by modifying the code to call the coderef twice, and then examined the trace produced by perl -Dt.)
So it would appear that it is just the anonymous pad variable for the subexpression target that is grabbing the memory.
Hugo
In reply to Re^5: Memory usage breakup
by hv
in thread Memory usage breakup
by eXile
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |