I agree with the sentiment, if applied to testing in general, but I don't see how it furthers the argument for testing first. Perhaps I'm missing something.
As an Aside: If you're wondering the reason why testing is not a big priority at this job, it's because the perl is almost all demos and one offs. If it's not worth saving, it's not worth testing (much) in my mind. So mainly I seem to be testing the code that gets re-used. As that code grows, so do the tests.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: testing code
by nmcfarl
in thread testing code
by geekgrrl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |