I'm sorry, you are right that it's always good to avoid redundant operations. I just wanted to point out that sqrt was not a likely bottleneck, but that the algorithm was the problem (and in that we agree). By avoiding sqrt you might get a size-independent 5% percent improvement if you are lucky, but by using a better algorithm you get a 99% improvement for sufficiently large systems if you have N^1 scaling instead of N^2 (note: by improvement I mean reduction in execution time).
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Processing data with lot of math...
by itub
in thread Processing data with lot of math...
by qhayaal
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |